There are three things you should rarely ever bet against: the Leaf’s opposing team in the playoffs, the American consumer’s ability to spend, and corporate profits. As we are now about halfway through U.S. earnings season, once again, positive surprises remain the norm; 81% have beaten. It's a bit better than the 20-year average of 75%. The fact is that companies are good at managing analysts’ expectations. At least enough to beat them when the numbers hit the tape. The size of the positive surprises have been encouraging as well, at just under 10%. The highest surprise magnitude in some time. One of our reservations on the sustainability of this market rally over the past couple of quarters has been the flat earnings revisions. In other words, global markets are up over 20% but earnings estimates have remained flat or tilted down slightly. More often than not, markets trend in the same direction as earnings revisions. Earnings get revised up when companies raise guidance and/or analysts become more encouraged about growth prospects. That is a good thing for markets. Obviously, downward revisions are bad. Yet estimates have remained very flat as markets marched higher, a challenging combination.

The oil market has been interesting lately and, to the surprise of many, has been the biggest silent outperformer this year. There is no shortage of geopolitical events to choose from that’s leading to a higher risk premium in oil with Brent breaking $90, whether it’s the Houthis missile attacks in the Red Sea leading to a massive re-route of trade, Ukraine’s drone strikes on Russian refineries, and the latest escalation between Israel and Iran leading to some news outlets using WWIII as click bait-y headlines. Given the run-up in oil prices, Canadian oil equities have clearly benefitted from the much higher torque. But there is a layer of even better news: The Transmountain Expansion (TMX) continues to look to be in operation by May, which would lead to much better pricing on the Western Canadian Select (WCS). With the current setup for the oil markets, some key questions that we often get from investors are: How sustainable is the rally in Canadian energy names? To determine if the oil equities are overstretched, we can look at the debt-adjusted cash flow (DACF) multiples of the major integrated oil names and see how the valuation has shifted in light of the recent oil move. From Exhibit 1, the DACF multiples for the Canadian integrated have been fairly range-bound over the last year, also in line with WTI, which has been in the $70 - $85 range. As a starting point, we can infer that the valuations of the companies have been commensurate with the movements in the underlying oil price deck and in line with where the equities should trade in the cycle historically over the last couple of years. Typically, in the commodities cycle, higher prices are usually coupled with lower multiples as market participants will usually price in lower normalized prices and vice versa, so a cause of concern would be if valuation starts trending towards the 6.5x – 7.0x+ area if oil prices continue to stay in the upper bounds of the $70 - $90 range or higher.

The CAD vs USD exchange rate has certainly been on the move over the past few months, to the detriment of the loonie. After rising into year-end to finish 2023 at about 75 ½ cents, the CAD has fallen down close to 72 ½ cents. The CAD is trading near the lower end of its recent range. Ah, remember the days when the loonie was on par with the U.S. dollar? Disney trips felt cheap, cross-border shopping was all the rage, and oil carried an average price of $96/bbl. Huh, with oil moving from the $70s to the high $80s, that sure doesn't match a 72 ½ cent loonie. Are we no longer a petrol currency? Maybe a decade of underinvestment and uncertainty around takeaway infrastructure can change a currency's stripes. Or there are other factors that are bigger than the oil impact on our currency exchange with the almighty dollar.

Dividend investing is supposed to be easy. Find quality companies with long track records of paying or even increasing their dividends, buy some shares, collect your regular tax-advantaged payments over time and watch the share price go higher. Maybe in a strong bull market, dividend companies don’t rise as much, but they have better stability in down markets as most are lower beta than the overall market. Well, over the past year, the TSX has been up about 13% while the Dow Jones Canada Select Dividend Index (a good proxy for dividend investing) has been up 3%. Trailing in an upmarket is fine, but not by that much. The DJ Select Dividend Index was created in the late 1990s and this is only the fifth time that it has lagged the broader TSX by more than 10% on a trailing one-year basis. Interestingly, most of the previous occurrences coincided with brief periods when a non-bank became the largest weight in the TSX. In the late 90s, it was Nortel; in 2007, it was Encana, Potash, and Blackberry. The 10% threshold was almost reached in 2015 when Valeant became the biggest company in the TSX. And in 2019, it was Shopify.

Financial literacy is predicated on asking the question, “Why?” Why does this market keep moving higher? Why is inflation fading so slowly? Why are home prices high given low affordability? A stronger financial literacy or understanding likely leads to fewer investing mistakes; nobody likes mistakes. Our weekly publication often attempts to answer questions on various topics, dive into them, explain them, provide some context and share our views on what could happen next. In the past few weeks, we have talked about IPOs, gold, and inflation – hopefully improving our readers’ financial literacy and our own in the process of researching and writing. Sometimes, the questions being asked are not macro topics such as the economy, or inflation, or upcoming elections, but more focused on portfolio construction and positioning. Why are our portfolios overweight Japanese equities? Why did we add preferred shares? Why is our credit exposure low? Why are we moderately underweight U.S. equities? To answer these questions, we created the WHY Report, which is a monthly chart-heavy report that shares most of our current multi-asset portfolio tilts, explaining our rationale for that tilt. Most are working out well, some not so much. Even with strong financial literacy, mistakes still happen. With the first quarter of 2024 now in the rearview, today’s report dives into a number of portfolio tilts and sections from our monthly WHY Report . Why are we positioned the way we are? If you would like to receive the WHY Report on a monthly basis, along with any changes to our positioning over time, there is a sign-up at the end of the report. Now, let’s jump into it.

No denying the equity markets are in the throws of a strong advance. The S&P is up 21% over the past six months, Europe is up 19%, Japan 25%. And given the even stronger gains in pockets such as AI, there is no shortage of people talking bubbles. Ourselves included ( Ethos from a few weeks ago ) but it isn’t a system wide bubble, more isolated mini bubbles in our opinion. Doesn’t mean it won’t hurt at some point, yet unlikely to be overly destabilizing. Fact is, a number of key ingredients are missing to label as a major bubble. Equity flows is one as there isn’t really a rush of cash coming into the market as measured by fund & ETF flow data. And another crucial ingredient is the IPO market. Yesterday Reddit IPOed (Initial Public Offering) with an offer size of $748 million and closed on day one at $1.25 billion. That gives the company a total value of $7.5 billion, not bad given $800 million in sales during the last 12- months. IPOs doubling on the first day of trading was a weekly occurrence in the tech bubble, yet this was anything but regular. The IPO market has remained very quiet. In North America $5 billion of IPOs began trading so far this year, on pace for the bleak annual pace for the past two years of $17B in 2023 and $22B in 2022. Even more anemic is Canada, with virtually no IPOs in 2024 so far.

The primary cause of the market declines in 2022 was inflation and the subsequent response by central banks. Rates higher, yields higher, stock prices lower… yuck. The stock market rally in 2023 was a bit more complicated but a big driver was inflation coming back down, opening the door for central banks to stop raising rates and for bond yields to stabilize. Yay. Now with 2024 well underway and the equity market up smartly, should we be concerned that inflation doesn’t seem to be going quietly into the night?  Last week, the U.S. Consumer Prices Index (CPI) data came in a bit warmer than expected by the consensus. The month-over-month change was 0.4%, both headline and core, excluding food and energy; this brought the year-over-year to tick up a bit from 3.1% to 3.2% and the core from 3.7% to 3.8%. This probably wasn’t a big deal; the equity market shrugged it off, and bond yields moved a bit higher in response. We could argue the finer details, such as insurance moving higher or shelter, but really, it was a lack of price deflation in goods. Good prices had been falling for the past six months, helping overall inflation come down. There was further evidence goods deflation may be waning in the Producer Prices data released later in the week. The market had more of a negative reaction to this information.

The history of markets is filled with examples of bubbles, creating great wealth on the way up and subsequently destroying much wealth on the way back down. Some date back centuries, such as the Mississippi Company, tulip mania, South Sea trading or the railway bubbles. Some are more recent, such as the nifty 50, dotcom, housing in the early years of this century and marijuana in the 2010s. In each instance, there was always a solid foundational case supporting the bubble because the world was changing in one way or another. Yet, in each instance, markets became over-enthusiastic and went too far, inevitably resulting in the popping of the bubble. There are two constants investors should remember when investing in potential bubbles – markets always go too far, both up and down. And gravity exerts its force, inevitably.

So far this year, investors have piled into cash, added into bonds and sucked money out of equities. Apologies, we are going to use U.S. listed data here for convenience and because larger numbers are more fun. Based on ICI data, investors have sucked $25B out of equities, added $122 billion to cash and added $52 billion to bonds. The chart below is the rolling 4-week average flows into bonds and equities. Equities have remained sporadic over the past few years, with brief periods of inflows and outflows. In 2023, a solid year in the market, equity outflows were $133 billion, so the trend in 2024 remains much the same. Bonds, which experienced HUGE outflows in 2022 as yields rose, have been seeing more inflows of late.